In a move that could redefine the future of lawmaking, the United Arab Emirates has unveiled plans to integrate legal artificial intelligence into its legislative processes. The initiative, announced by the UAE Office of Regulatory Intelligence (ORI), aims to increase the efficiency of drafting, reviewing, and updating laws by up to 70%. It’s a world-first effort to position AI not merely as a tool but as a “co-legislator”—a move described by Prime Minister Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum as transformative for legal systems.
While countries worldwide are cautiously adopting AI in regulatory and judicial contexts, the UAE’s plan goes significantly further, raising both optimism and concern.
What’s Changing?
Under this initiative, AI will be used to automate aspects of lawmaking traditionally reliant on human expertise. It will assist in drafting laws, identifying outdated provisions, and proposing amendments in real time. Rooted in English common law—on which much of Dubai’s legal system is based—the approach capitalizes on established legal logic but accelerates it with modern computational power
Why AI in Lawmaking?
Pros:
Faster Legislation: AI can rapidly analyze large bodies of legal text and data, drastically reducing the time needed to update or create legislation.Cost Efficiency: Automating routine legislative tasks could lower the cost of regulatory governance.Enhanced Consistency: AI can spot errors, overlaps, and outdated language across laws more efficiently than manual reviews.
Strategic Leadership: This move reinforces the UAE’s role as a pioneer in legal innovation and tech-forward governance.
But Caution Is Warranted
AI’s Limited Judgement: While AI excels at logic and pattern recognition, it lacks the moral, cultural, and contextual reasoning that underpins effective lawmaking.Risk of “Hallucinations”: AI models can generate convincing but false outputs, potentially introducing serious errors into legislation
Democratic Oversight: Removing or reducing human judgment risks undermining the principles of accountability and public interest.Judicial Backlogs: If flawed AI-generated laws proliferate, courts—such as the UAE’s Supreme Federal Court—may be burdened with challenges and corrections.
A Smarter Approach?: AI as an Assistant, Not a Lawmaker
Rather than replace human lawmakers, AI should be deployed to assist them—particularly in technical areas like issue-spotting, consistency checks, and impact analysis. Supervised by legal experts, AI can flag potential issues and propose optimizations, allowing human decision-makers to focus on judgment, fairness, and fit-for-purpose outcomes.This hybrid approach would reduce administrative workload and support the ORI’s efficiency goals, without compromising legal integrity.
What This Means Globally
The UAE’s initiative sets a powerful precedent. If successful, it could inspire similar models worldwide, particularly in jurisdictions seeking to modernize complex legal systems. However, this also brings to light a broader question: who governs the algorithms that help govern us?Lawmaking demands transparency, accountability, and trust—qualities that must remain human-led, even as AI becomes an indispensable tool.
Pushing the Boundaries of Legal Innovation
The UAE is pushing the boundaries of legal innovation, and its AI co-legislator concept is both impressive and provocative. The opportunity to streamline and modernize legislation is clear—but so is the need for caution.AI can and should support human lawmakers, not replace them. With the right checks, balances, and expert oversight, this ambitious initiative could mark the dawn of a smarter, faster, yet still fundamentally human legal system.
Latest posts by Five Fantastic Lawyers™ (see all)
- What is the Difference Between Fault vs. No-Fault Insurance? - June 8, 2025
- Chris Mova’s Personal Journey From Accident Victim to Legal Advocate - May 6, 2025
- AI as Co-Legislator: The UAE’s Bold Legal Experiment - April 17, 2025